Like the point of these debates is knowing that the most odious conclusions of your syllogisms clearly aren’t true (men like Moynihan do not believe Arabs are inherently violent) so where must your logic break down on the way to that conclusion? An intelligent person is curious to figure this out, and not judgmental about people they don…
Like the point of these debates is knowing that the most odious conclusions of your syllogisms clearly aren’t true (men like Moynihan do not believe Arabs are inherently violent) so where must your logic break down on the way to that conclusion? An intelligent person is curious to figure this out, and not judgmental about people they don’t know. What a very sad state of affairs that such incurious people occupy such stature in our society.
Like the point of these debates is knowing that the most odious conclusions of your syllogisms clearly aren’t true (men like Moynihan do not believe Arabs are inherently violent) so where must your logic break down on the way to that conclusion? An intelligent person is curious to figure this out, and not judgmental about people they don’t know. What a very sad state of affairs that such incurious people occupy such stature in our society.