She is one of the few people on her side who actually believes in what she says on this issue and also has the tactical ability and rhetorical skill to not regularly beclown herself in doing so.
She wins by not losing her cool and getting her opponents to lose theirs first. Dangerous and effective but not necessarily proof that her side is correct.
She is one of the few people on her side who actually believes in what she says on this issue and also has the tactical ability and rhetorical skill to not regularly beclown herself in doing so.
She wins by not losing her cool and getting her opponents to lose theirs first. Dangerous and effective but not necessarily proof that her side is correct.
I have never heard or seen her before, and I'm not on Twitter/X. So this was my first exposure.
To me, she came across as dim. She never answered the question at hand, and instead filibustered with non sequiturs. She was also rude as hell. I did not find it effective in the least. She took one of the most polarizing issues of our time and did the unthinkable: united the audience in their dislike of her.
She is one of the few people on her side who actually believes in what she says on this issue and also has the tactical ability and rhetorical skill to not regularly beclown herself in doing so.
She wins by not losing her cool and getting her opponents to lose theirs first. Dangerous and effective but not necessarily proof that her side is correct.
That's one way to see it, I guess.
I have never heard or seen her before, and I'm not on Twitter/X. So this was my first exposure.
To me, she came across as dim. She never answered the question at hand, and instead filibustered with non sequiturs. She was also rude as hell. I did not find it effective in the least. She took one of the most polarizing issues of our time and did the unthinkable: united the audience in their dislike of her.